SpendingContractsPurchase order
What has the City paid on purchase order GAETL50TL205068203?
$729 paid to 2 different vendors (the largest, Citibank, N.A., received $644.5) across 3 payments from March 12, 2020 to April 7, 2020, charged to Non-Departmental / Benchmarking Study.
2 different vendors draw against this purchase order, so the $729 above is the whole order, not the spend of whichever vendor you arrived from. The City uses these for standing arrangements like outside counsel, library materials and expert witnesses. Per-vendor amounts are below.
What it was for
Benchmarking StudyBudget line.
Order description, as published:
PRIVACY-NON-DEPARTMENTAL - APPROPRIATIONS TO SPECIAL PURPOSE FUND
Approval records
No council file, contract number or payment authority appears in this order's checkbook records.
Paid from
Engineering Special Service FD
restricted revenue (grants, fees or a dedicated tax) that can only be spent on this purpose — not general-fund tax dollars.
Department: Non-Departmental
Paid to
Every payment, in order
Payment requests are numbered sequentially by the City, so the order here is the order they were approved. Several requests clearing on one day usually means invoices were held and released together.
| # | Paid | Invoiced | Lag | Reference | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | March 12, 2020 | March 3, 2020 | 9d | AIRFARE 02/07/20-02/07/20 CA MULTI-AGENCY CIP BENCHMARKING STUDY 2020 SAN JOSE,CA | $358 |
| 2 | March 12, 2020 | March 3, 2020 | 9d | AIRFARE 02/07/20-02/07/20 CA MULTI-AGENCY CIP BENCHMARKING STUDY 2020 SAN JOSE,CA | $286 |
| 3 | April 7, 2020 | February 13, 2020 | 54d | PRIVACY-NON-DEPARTMENTAL - APPROPRIATIONS TO SPECIAL PURPOSE FUND | $85 |
Download this table: ·
Draw-down shape
Sources
LA Controller, Checkbook LA (pggv-e4fn), read live and grouped by po_num, which is populated on about 90% of payments. Council files link to the City Clerk's Council File Management System. The City's biggest contracts · The checkbook.