Every check the city writes, every department's spending, every audit finding — searchable, sourced, and current.
This platform traces every dollar the City of Los Angeles collects, appropriates, and spends — from the adopted budget through the checkbook to the vendor who receives payment. It draws from eight categories of open data: budget appropriations, actual spending, employee payroll, 311 service requests, crime incidents, building permits, homelessness programs, and deep-dive analyses of LAPD, Fire, pensions, liability, contracts, and health insurance.
What the data reveals is not a city in crisis. It is a city facing a set of interconnected fiscal challenges that are serious, structural, and — with sustained attention — solvable. LA's problems are not mysteries. They are patterns, visible in the numbers, waiting for leaders who are willing to look at them honestly.
The following are the ten major areas of focus that emerge from a comprehensive reading of the data. None of them are simple. All of them are addressable.
The majority of LA's general fund flows directly to employee salaries, overtime, health insurance, and pension contributions. LAPD is the single largest department by appropriation — and when you add city-wide pension and healthcare costs allocated to sworn officers, the all-in cost is substantially higher than the line-item budget shows. Fire department personnel costs routinely exceed their own departmental budget because health insurance and pension contributions are funded from city-wide accounts. This isn't inherently wrong — a city runs on its people — but it means that every raise, every new hire, and every pension adjustment cascades through the entire fiscal structure. Understanding this dynamic is the first step toward managing it.
LAPD and LAFD overtime spending consistently runs in the hundreds of millions annually — a significant fraction of regular pay. The Fire Department spends enough on overtime to hire hundreds of additional firefighters at base salary plus benefits. When overtime becomes permanent — when mandatory 24-hour shifts at 1.5x pay are the norm rather than the exception — it signals chronic understaffing being masked by premium labor costs. Every dollar spent on overtime buys less service than a dollar spent on a new hire. The data suggests LA is paying surge pricing for baseline operations, year after year.
The city contributes billions annually to its two retirement systems — LACERS (civilian) and LAFPP (police and fire). LACERS alone carries billions in unfunded liabilities that must be closed over the next 20-30 years through escalating city contributions. With more retirees per active worker each year, and benefits paid exceeding contributions in some periods, investment returns must bridge the gap. A single market downturn can widen the shortfall overnight. LACERS data is available through open data; LAFPP operates separately and its figures are estimated from published annual reports. This is the city's fastest-growing fixed obligation and the one most vulnerable to forces beyond the city's control.
LA has ramped homelessness spending dramatically in recent fiscal years, yet the point-in-time count has barely moved. Inside Safe — the mayor's encampment-clearing initiative — saw rapid spending growth to become a dominant line item, while Prop HHH, the $1.2 billion housing bond voters approved in 2016, has deployed only a fraction of its funds after nearly a decade. Based on LAHSA's 2024 count, roughly 46,000 people remain unsheltered while thousands of shelter beds sit unused nightly — the gap is not utilization, it's supply. The money is flowing; the question is whether it's flowing toward solutions that compound or ones that expire.
Police liability payouts have surged dramatically from their historical baseline. These settlements for misconduct, use-of-force, and wrongful arrest come directly from the General Fund — the same pool that funds parks, libraries, road repairs, and public safety. Every dollar paid to settle a lawsuit is a dollar not spent on the services Angelenos depend on. The cost amounts to tens of dollars per resident per year and effectively increases LAPD's true cost to taxpayers well beyond its official appropriation. Prevention — through training, accountability, and policy reform — is not just a moral imperative, it is a fiscal one.
Across multiple spending categories, a small number of vendors capture an outsized share of city dollars. In homelessness, LAHSA receives the majority of Inside Safe funds as an intermediary before distributing to hotel operators. In contracts, the top five recipients can account for the majority of all contractual spending. In health insurance, a handful of providers split the vast majority of annual premiums across tens of thousands of employees. Concentration is not automatically problematic — sometimes the best vendor should win — but it demands proportional oversight. When a single entity controls a major funding pipeline, outcome tracking and competitive benchmarking become essential, not optional.
Building permit data reveals the structural tension in LA's housing market: new construction permits fluctuate year to year, but the total pipeline of dwelling units approved has not kept pace with population growth and housing demand. Processing times vary dramatically by permit subtype, and construction valuations reveal where investment concentrates geographically. Meanwhile, Prop HHH's permanent supportive housing units face escalating per-unit costs (reported by the LA Controller to exceed $600K in some projects) — meaning the bond will likely deliver far fewer units than the 10,000 originally promised. The gap between what LA builds and what LA needs continues to widen, with consequences that ripple through homelessness counts, rental prices, and neighborhood stability.
Hundreds of thousands of 311 service requests per year paint a granular picture of neighborhood-level needs — bulky item pickup, graffiti removal, street repairs, illegal dumping. The data reveals sharp geographic concentration: some districts generate disproportionate request volumes, and the top five request types account for the vast majority of all calls. Resolution rates and seasonal patterns offer a real-time dashboard of city responsiveness. Digital adoption is growing but phone remains significant, meaning service access is not yet equitable across demographics. This data, properly analyzed, is one of the most powerful tools the city has for allocating resources to where they are actually needed rather than where they are politically expedient.
LA spends thousands of dollars per reported crime on LAPD alone — before counting liability payouts, city attorney costs, or incarceration expenses. Crime incidents concentrate heavily in a handful of neighborhoods, and the split between crimes against persons, property, and society reveals different intervention needs. Yet the spending data tells us only what the response infrastructure costs, not what it achieves. Clearance rates, response times, and recidivism are not captured in the checkbook. The city's single largest expenditure category — public safety — is also the one with the widest gap between dollars spent and outcomes measured.
LA's General Fund revenue is heavily concentrated in a small number of sources — the top three revenue categories can account for more than half of all collections. Tax revenue dominates, and per-capita metrics reveal that every Angeleno effectively contributes thousands of dollars annually to city operations. While collection rates have remained strong and five-year growth trends are positive, this concentration means that a downturn in any single revenue category — property tax, sales tax, or business tax — can create an outsized budget gap. Diversification and reserve fund management are not abstract fiscal policy concepts; they are the difference between maintaining services during the next recession and making emergency cuts.
None of these problems appeared overnight, and none will be solved overnight. But every one of them becomes more manageable when the data is visible. A city that can see where its money goes is a city that can choose where its money goes. A city that measures outcomes — not just expenditures — is a city that can distinguish between programs that work and programs that persist out of inertia.
Los Angeles has the scale, the talent, and the tax base to address every challenge on this list. What it has lacked is a decision-making tool that shows the full picture — not filtered through press releases or budget summaries, but traced to the transaction, the vendor, and the dollar.
That is what this platform provides.
Drill into any category for full analysis, charts, and downloadable data.